• go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Did you even look at the article or did you see “Cloud flare” in the title and immediately grabbed your pitchfork?

      The article is outlining a situation where Cloudflare is advocating to maintain privacy.

      • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        This haves nothing to do with the article. Cloudflare overall haves too much power on the Internet. On August 31st 2022, Matthew Prince (Cloudflare’s CEO) released a statement defending his role as a service provider and not a regulatory body. But 3 days later, Cloudflare blocks a website called Kiwifarms. You maybe thinking, “Wait, that goes against his first statement he made.”. You’re right. I ask you, do you want a company like that to have so much power over the Internet?

        • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          omg that bar that kicked me out for being a belligerent asshole has stopped being a bar and now they’ve become the police. They have too much power!

        • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They can be service provider and can stop providing those services to, well, basically anyone. It’s not like they literally blocked them off the internet.

        • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Business, the core of their business model over any other CDN is that steadfast privacy that they will only give information when it’s mandated by a court order