• ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    That does not matter, by law, he is an adult. The term “teen” is used when under 18 in the news. This is clear bias because of his race.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        If I told you, “Gary’s fucking a teenager,” I’m guessing you wouldn’t assume that teenager was over 18 and would be thinking maybe the authorities should be contacted.

        • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          5 days ago

          I absolutely would. Do you watch porn? There’s a whole “teen” category

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Sorry… you would “absolutely” assume that if I told you that “Gary [i.e. someone we both know on a first-name basis] is fucking a teenager” that the person was of legal age because of a porn category?

            Because I’m pretty sure we don’t mutually know a porn star named Gary.

            This also makes me worried about your feelings on incest.

            • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              5 days ago

              Wow wtf is that kind of strawman? Do you not see the basic correlation between “fucking a teenager” and “fucking a teenager in porn”? porn has normalized that fucking a teenager is 18

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Do you not see the basic correlation between “fucking a teenager” and “fucking a teenager in porn”?

                Yes, the same correlation between “fucking his daughter” and “fucking his daughter in porn.” When you hear Gary’s doing it, you call the fucking cops.

                Most people are able to distinguish what they see on a screen from reality.

                • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  19
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Why are you even talking about incest? What’s your obsession with fucking your daughter?

          • Baggins@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            And quite a few of those ‘teens’ are well over twenty.

            Or so I was told.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              My favorite is when they’re “just turned 18” in one video and “MILF” in the next.

              They are, of course, not technically mutually exclusive, but one doesn’t normally imagine much overlap between those genres.

      • escapedgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        We all get it, the type of porn you watch is still legal even though it has teen in the name.

        This is regarding a legal matter where the man’s sentence will likely be decided by the fact that the court sees him as an adult. In most cases and as the other user pointed out 18 year olds are referred to as men in a legal context. This disturbingly seems to be the standard practice when describing black males of 18.

        Generally speaking, describing alleged criminals as teens implies a lack of legal agency and thus biases the reader toward compassion. The point is that sometimes language can induce bias and consistency is needed. If that consistency falls towards the technicality of having the word teen in their name so be it, but that is not the case with our current media landscape.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not their fault they were born with an understanding of nuance that was two sizes too small

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        Literally just repeating the originally argument instead of responding to the responses. Go fuck yourself.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        LOL you’re delving into the typical sorts of pedantics that people turn to when they don’t have an argument. “OOH OOH but Merriam Webster says that ‘teenager’ means blah blah blah” while completely sidestepping the fact that this person is a legal adult and is fully responsible for their actions, which is what the adults in the room are talking about now.