feel like they can be very useful

  • lyam23@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a still a need to surface and prioritize good discussion. Upvotes remain a pretty good way of doing this, especially when removing the downvotes.

    • RGB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not surface communities based on activity. As in how active the comments section is. That way agreements and disagreements are weighed equally.

      • lyam23@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d be interested in seeing that experiment in the comment section. It could be implemented with another filter (similar to the “Activity” filter in the post listing, I’d guess). Still, this wouldn’t present a qualitative difference between “good” and “bad” discussion. But it might surface “interesting” discussion for a certain type of member.

      • frogman [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        i feel like this incentivises ‘controversial’ posting. content that is designed to illicit a response, good or bad. i feel like this is another avenue to creating an inflammatory space.