• CodeHead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    So, remember… they just ‘switched’ from forced arbitration to going into the courts. Yes it is good, but note ‘Good guy Gabe’ didn’t start this way.

    Maybe consider ‘why’ he’s making the change? It’s actually because this forces the money question to the one suing them. It costs them less by doing this. Now I think this is actually good, but don’t blindly fawn over the guy for this.

    • tryp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ars technica provided the two key pieces of context here:

      “Zaiger targeted Valve and Steam users for its scheme precisely because the arbitration clause in the SSA [Steam Subscriber Agreement] is ‘favorable’ to Steam users in that Valve agrees to pay the fees and costs associated with arbitration,” Valve said.

      Valve said that Zaiger’s “extortive plan” was to “offer a settlement slightly less than the [arbitration] charge—$2,900 per claim or so—attempting to induce a quick resolution.”

      https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/09/steam-doesnt-want-to-pay-arbitration-fees-tells-gamers-to-sue-instead/

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can Zaiger do it to other corpos with forced arbitration?

        • blusterydayve26@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Only if they, too, were willing to foot the bill for the arbitration fees. Hint: nobody else does that, they want the consumer to pay their own way to reduce filings. That’s what happened with Twitter’s severance filings, they got hit with millions in arbitration fees.