cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/3151661

Someone mentioned this film in one of our other discussions. I vaguely remember seeing it many years ago, but really couldn’t remember many of the details, so I put it on this weekend. Hot damned if it wasn’t so much better than I remember. Maybe the world we live in today feels a lot more relevant to the film then when I had seen it before, but I would gladly declare this film a masterpiece of it’s time that holds up today. Don’t let the newer remake besmirch your perception of this movie. It hits on several levels. Thinking of the context of the film, it is not difficult to see the concern that the auteurs of the time felt over the possibility, or even likelihood of nuclear war. If you haven’t seen this one, it’s worth your time.

I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on the film.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.caEnglish
    10·
    1 year ago

    I think old movies are better in many ways. New movies have the shaky Cam and the angry whisper that you can’t hear.

    • freamon@endlesstalk.orgEnglish
      5·
      1 year ago

      Before the shaky cam though, there was the Steadicam, the invention of which (1975) is pretty much my cut-off for how far I’ll go back. But yeah, ‘the angry whispers’ is A) a great name for a band, and B) one of the reasons why we’re all so newly dependent of subtitles