Similar to Mastodon’s spikes last year, it seems. Anyways, there is data to think about. Source

  • requiem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it’s about a craving for centralisation but for newcomers and people still learning the core ideas about decentralisation it’s about a promise of more active engagement and more varied content.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And FOMO. New users gravitate towards the large instances because they think they will miss content, not knowing they can easily access said content on any instance as long as it hasn’t defederated from them.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m barely seeing any content at all, I often see a post click on the community and it shows either 2 other posts and nothing else or nothing at all. It constantly seems like the majority of posts just disappear into the void.

      • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is much much more of a pain to access content on small instances where it hasn’t synced yet. It means visiting those larger instances anyway to check if it’s worth subscribing to communities. And then trying to actually subscribe is a lesson in patience while it gives you no search results and errors out if you try to visit an unsynced community directly.

    • FuzzChef@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course it’s not about centralisation per se, but the problems that a centralised platform does not have to deal with.