District Attorney Fani Willis warned Fulton County commissioners this weekend they should “stay alert” over the next month, according to emails obtained by CBS News.

      • timespace@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Out of an abundance of caution?

        The article doesn’t provide any such threat being made. I’m not saying there weren’t threats made, I’m saying I don’t know, because the article doesn’t provide that information.

      • timespace@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why are you being a cunt? Does the article list any threats or does it not? Can you read?

        I’m not defending these assclowns. I don’t support racist idiots. I’m just pointing out that there aren’t any threats being made in the article, and the US has strong free speech laws - you’re allowed to call people racist names if you want to, it’s a protected right to do so. If any of these dumb fucks threatened the DA, then yes that is a punishable offense.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          She pointed to a threatening email she received last week with a subject line reading, “Fani Willis = Corrupt N*****.”

          Just because you didn’t get to read it, doesn’t mean it wasn’t threatening.

          Yeah, I’m being a cunt (your words) because you seem to be seallioning.

          These are credible and you just seem to want to downplay it.

          So glasses or a lesson in context clues?

          • timespace@lemmy.ninja
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not downplaying anything lmao. You’re reading so hard into my comments trying to find something that isn’t there.

            I was questioning what people would be charged for, because the quotes in the article are not chargeable.

            I’ll say it again because you clearly are having a tough time comprehending - if threats were made, those people should be charged with a crime.

            • HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              So both. Got it.

              They probably withheld the ACTUAL EVIDENCE because there probably is an ONGOING investigation.

              • timespace@lemmy.ninja
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Again, no evidence of any of that from the article. You keep injecting things without any evidence.

                Carry on!

                • HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Do you have a better source? Or are you just pissing around because people are taking these people’s word on it? Because again you really haven’t shown why they shouldn’t be believed

                  • timespace@lemmy.ninja
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Who should be believed? What are you on about?

                    I’m not sure how to make this any more clear - the article does not provide anything about threats being made or an ongoing investigation.

                    So my original question was, based on the linked article, what would these dumb racist fucks be charged with?

                    Since you seem to admit the article does not provide evidence of threats of bodily injury or harm being made, and no ongoing investigation thereto, it seems only reasonable to conclude at this time based on the evidence in the article there is not a charge that can be made against these dumb pieces of shit.

                    That’s my only point. That’s it. Are we on the same page yet?