The title says it all!

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I encourage everyone considering sending the invite to review OP’s comment history. I was about to share one but yikes.

    • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      We may not all think alike or obtain the same Linux ISOs. I am okay with that and feel we all should be okay with differing opinions and viewpoints, especially in a secular society.

      I defended the comedian Dave Chapelle and questioned the term “toxic masculinity” in 2 posts which lead to a long (and apparently scrutinized) comment history.

      • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Based comment history. If I had any invites left I would have given it to you. I can’t stand people who stalk people’s comment history. It’s friggin stupid

        • misk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I expect to be held liable for people I invite to other people’s places, therefore I don’t invite randos or people that have proven to have little regard for others.

          • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Invitations and referrals do carry liability. However, I would say that if you have a differing opinion, others attack with little regard. The “mob mentality” is inert and affluent in social media. Then you are left to defend your differing viewpoint, leaving a trail of more dissenting comments which are also attacked to the nth degree. I honestly thought this federated experiment would be different. I was wrong.

        • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thanks. We reached that dystopian part where people are judged based on their social credits and “likability” and conformance index to the masses.

    • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      If that is how you evaluate individuals, I wouldn’t accept the invite. Principle means more than some invite to an indexer.

    • seang96@spgrn.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Any chance I could get one off of you? I have been waiting for a post for open sign ups haha. I don’t mind not having it since I have 2 other indexers so not really in a rush for it.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have plenty of invites so that’s no problem, just send me your email over PM.

  • Brad Boimler@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not sure why everyone is saying to not give the invite all I can see is comments about free speech and such and that is true we all have freedom of speech under the constitution?? Confused.

    • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Critical thinking is hindered with group think. Thanks for objectively reviewing my comment history.