• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well the watermark would be a kind of signature that leads back to a registered artist.

      I think it makes sense to enforce this for all AI art, basically label it in a way that can be traced back to who produced it.

      And if you don’t want people to know you produced it, then you probably shouldn’t share it

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It would be for using AI, not creating art.

          I’m just brainstorming here, but I can’t imagine how you would control AI art without some sort of regulation or licensing on the side of the AI creator…

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re quite correct your thinking it seems unrealistic to actually detect AI generated imagery after the fact so the only fill solution would be a trusted chain of custody - it wouldn’t necessarily need a centralized authority but it would require some highly trusted issuers of trust and, unfortunately, trust in media is currently at an all time low and those companies are in the best position to serve as those issuers.

            This is a very complicated problem and we need a social (rather than a technical) solution.