• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    My question to you is how is it different than a human in this regard? I would go to class, study the material, hope to retain it, so I could then apply that knowledge on the test.

    The ai is trained on the data, “hopes” to retain it, so it can apply it on the test. It’s not storing the book, so what’s the actual difference?

    And if you have an answer to that, my follow up would be “what’s the effective difference?” If we stick an ai and a human in a closed room and give them a test, why does it matter the intricacies of how they are storing and recalling the data?

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      holy fuck you’re a moron

      please go read a book, and look at some art. no, marvel media doesn’t count.

      • JohnBierce@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Me, about to suggest some actually really good, thought provoking Marvel comics that somehow got made alongside the relentless superhero soap opera: oh wait now isn’t the time, we’re dunking on the AI bro

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not sure what you even mean by “how is it different”, but for starters a human can actually get a good mark at the bar and spicy autocomplete clearly cannot.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        spicy autocomplete clearly cannot.

        What you are basing this “it clearly cannot” on? Because an early iteration of it was mediocre at it? The first ICE cars were slower than horses, I’m afraid this statement may be the equivalent of someone pointing at that and saying “cars can’t get good at going fast.”

        But I specifically asked “in this regard”, referring to taking a test after previously having trained yourself on the data.

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          What you are basing this “it clearly cannot” on?

          I asked Gemini and it told me that ChatGPT can’t do shit, I’m not gonna question it.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            So, it’s either perfect right now, or never capable of anything. Great critical and nuanced thinking.