• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The oppression of minorities is racism.

    Incorrect. The oppression of someone because of their race is racism. A minority could be oppressed because of their sex and that would be sexism, not racism. A minority could be oppressed because of their socio-economic standing and that would classism, not racism. A minority could be oppressed just because the oppressor is an asshole, and that would not be racism.

    To White people’s standards of physical appearance.

    Agreed. Although, I would say western standard more than white, but it’s more a subset rather than something separate.

    White people’s culture typically depicts men with short hair.

    Depends on the culture. Also you’re talking about modern western culture. Not white culture in general. Even the US, which is a baby of a country, has had presidents who had long hair while in office. Almost as late as the 1850s.

    disproportionately affects Black people

    I’ve yet to see anyone actually make a case for young black young men having/desiring long hair more than young white men. My experience is the exact opposite. Of course that is anecdotal and I’m not offering out to prove anything, but only to say why I don’t simply accept the claim as a postulate.

    We would all be better off with equality.

    Sure. But assuming that because something affected a black person it means it must be racism is not equality and we are not better off with it. And that is what I believe is happening here. I mean, we’re talking about policies that existed in historically white schools even before segregation. It’s not like schools wanting kids to have short hair is some new thing, it’s always been a tool of conformity to western standards. That now being applied to black people too is not racism, it’s just dumb as it always has been.

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Incorrect. The oppression of someone because of their race is racism. A minority could be oppressed because of their sex and that would be sexism, not racism. A minority could be oppressed because of their socio-economic standing and that would classism, not racism. A minority could be oppressed just because the oppressor is an asshole, and that would not be racism.

      The oppression of racial minorities is racism. This was evident based on the context of our discussion, but your argument splits hairs anyway.

      Depends on the culture. Also you’re talking about modern western culture. Not white culture in general. Even the US, which is a baby of a country, has had presidents who had long hair while in office. Almost as late as the 1850s.

      We are discussing a school in the United States in the year 2024. So it makes sense we would talk about modern White people culture here in the United States in this post-wig time period.

      I’ve yet to see anyone actually make a case for young black young men having/desiring long hair more than young white men. My experience is the exact opposite. Of course that is anecdotal and I’m not offering out to prove anything, but only to say why I don’t simply accept the claim as a postulate.

      The abundance of articles on a casual google search demonstrate this is something Black people are struggling with. It’s not a secret.

      But assuming that because something affected a black person

      It affects Black and Hispanic people disproportionately. That’s the give away that the policies are racially motivated.

      That now being applied to black people too is not racism

      It is being applied to students now to erase Black culture which is a form of racism. The fact it has affected White people previously and is currently doesn’t exclude it from being racist. White people being harmed by inequality doesn’t mean it’s not inequality. Again, we are all harmed by inequality, but not all of us are harmed equally. Black people are harmed more by racism, but we are all harmed by racism even if it’s to a lesser degree. White people would be better off without racism.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This was evident based on the context of our discussion,

        I’ve repeatedly stated that this is a policy meant to enforce conformity among boys and is likely not racism. The only one ignoring context on this point is you.

        We are discussing a school in the United States in the year 2024.

        lol. Just a couple of posts ago you had a whole paragraph arguing about how it’s cultural heritage.

        What your argument is describing is older generations of White people subjecting younger generations of White people to their cultural heritage. Some Black people celebrate their culture where men have long hair. While the policy does punish White people who are rejecting their cultural heritage it disproportionately affects Black people who are trying to celebrate their cultural heritage. Inequality harms everyone, but it doesn’t harm everyone equally. We would all be better off with equality. edit: capitalization

        Apparently you don’t know what heritage means:

        Something that is passed down from preceding generations; a tradition.

        Your argument is literally that because there is a history of long black hair, having them cut their hair is racist. But now when that point falls apart under scrutiny, we are no longer talking about the past and tradition, we are talking just about current culture.

        Now, do the trick you always do when your point gets destroyed and whine about me “splitting hairs.”

        It affects Black and Hispanic people disproportionately.

        Still waiting for this evidence. You’ve alluded to a lot, but have provided nothing.

        The fact it has affected White people previously and is currently doesn’t exclude it from being racist. White people being harmed by inequality doesn’t mean it’s not inequality. Again, we are all harmed by inequality, but not all of us are harmed equally. Black people are harmed more by racism, but we are all harmed by racism even if it’s to a lesser degree. White people would be better off without racism.

        On this point we agree. What we disagree on is that we know this particular rule is racist or being applied in a racist manner or that it’s intent is to erase black culture. I think (although could be convinced otherwise) it’s the same thing that it has always been: forcing conformity on young men.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Still waiting for this evidence. You’ve alluded to a lot, but have provided nothing.

          Here is the ACLU report on school dress codes impacting minorities:

          https://www.aclutx.org/sites/default/files/dresscodereport_2-1-24.pdf

          Page 29 has stats on how dress code enforcement impacts racial minorities.

          HOW THESE DRESS CODE RULES ARE ENFORCED Finally, our review of school district disciplinary data 64 indicates that students of certain races in the surveyed districts are more likely to face dress code discipline than others. Black students in the surveyed districts faced a hugely disproportionate amount of disciplinary action when compared to their share of the overall student population. Black students received 31.0% of the documented disciplinary instances but comprised only 12.1% of the surveyed student population. On the other hand, white students in the surveyed districts received a smaller share of the disciplinary instances (12.7%) than their share of the overall surveyed student population (25.1%), as did Asian, Native American, Pacific Islander, and multi-racial students. Hispanic students received a virtually identical share of disciplinary instances (45.5%) when compared to their share of the overall surveyed student population (45.3%).

          Black people are overrepresented in disciplinary action while White people are underrepresented in disciplinary action. While Hispanic people are not disproportionately overrepresented by a significant margin, they are still among the most targeted by disciplinary actions which is probably why news articles mention them.

          I’ve repeatedly stated that this is a policy meant to enforce conformity among boys and is likely not racism. The only one ignoring context on this point is you.

          This is factually incorrect as I already demonstrated. The policy disproportionately targets Black people to in order to erase their culture. Also, your argument being wrong is not context.

          lol. Just a couple of posts ago you had a whole paragraph arguing about how it’s cultural heritage.

          My point is that wigs are no longer part of White People’s culture. Everyone knows this. Your argument is disingenuous.

          Your argument is literally that because there is a history of long black hair, having them cut their hair is racist. But now when that point falls apart under scrutiny, we are no longer talking about the past and tradition, we are talking just about current culture.

          My point is that wigs aren’t relevant to the discussion. They had largely fallen out of favor in the US public at the start of the 19th century. White men started to wear their hair short. The fact that some Presidents still wore them in the 19th century, a minority of White people to be sure, is not relevant. Also, while some early 19th century US presidents wore wigs in their youth some of them they may have stopped by the time they took office or while holding office. It is common knowledge that wigs are not part of White people’s cultural heritage in the US.

          Now, do the trick you always do when your point gets destroyed and whine about me “splitting hairs.”

          Your argument about wigs has no merit and ignores what is actually happening as described in the article. No one is forcing people to wear wigs. They are forcing people to have short hair. Short hair has been the enduring cultural heritage of White men in the United States.

          forcing conformity on young men

          To White people’s standards of physical appearance. Your argument keeps leaving this out. Your argument relies on ignoring facts to attempt to ignore the policy’s racism.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Here is the ACLU report on school dress codes impacting minorities:

            If the claim is that rules/laws are applied unfairly on black students (or people in general), I absolutely agree. The stats strongly support this. But this all stems from a claim that there is a bigger culture among young black men to have long hair, for cultural reasoning, than for young white men. Just say you don’t have the evidence for this. It’s really that simple.

            The policy disproportionately targets Black

            No, what you’ve shown is that punishment is disproportionately doled out against black people. Something I agree with. But if that is the metric used to label a rule/law as racist, then virtually ever rule and law is racist. Which is, of course, nonsense. What you are arguing is that our justice system has biases in it, and something we both agree with.

            My point is that wigs are no longer part of White People’s culture.

            Then why talk about heritage at all? And who is talking about wigs? Not me.

            Your argument is disingenuous.

            Blatant projection.

            To White people’s standards of physical appearance. Your argument keeps leaving this out.

            You’re trying to have your cake and eat it too. You want to claim heritage when it comes to black people, but then only talk about modern western culture (which you attribute solely to white people) when it comes to white people. The reality is that if we look at modern western culture, even for black people, it’s predominately short hair. If we want to look at heritage of people, there are plenty of white heritages, include in the US itself, of men having long hair. It’s you who has the double-standard. If this is the metric by which we measure racism, then it’s you who is racist.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              But this all stems from a claim that there is a bigger culture among young black men to have long hair, for cultural reasoning, than for young white men.

              The ACLU report goes into detail about this starting at page 21. Pages 21 to 29 cover racial discrimination.

              https://www.aclutx.org/sites/default/files/dresscodereport_2-1-24.pdf

              RACE DISCRIMINATION Race discrimination is one of the most common and harmful types of discrimination. Racist stereotypes are deeply embedded in our society, and dress codes are no exception. Because many dress and grooming policies are written based on Euro-centric standards of dress and beauty, dress codes have historically marginalized, discounted, and suppressed styles of dress, hair, and grooming associated with Black people and other people of color. For example, some dress codes prohibit hair styles and textures—like Afros, braids, and locs—that are historically associated with African American hair practices. Others prohibit clothes and accessories—like du-rags, hair beads, and picks—based on associations with race and racial stereotypes, particularly those associated with Black people. Rules like these are rooted in racist standards of professionalism and respectability, and they marginalize many students of color.

              But if that is the metric used to label a rule/law as racist, then virtually ever rule and law is racist

              Yes, systemic racism exists in our society. It is deeply embedded in our intuitions.

              Then why talk about heritage at all?

              Because it is relevant to the discussion. The wigs specifically are not.

              And who is talking about wigs? Not me.

              Depends on the culture. Also you’re talking about modern western culture. Not white culture in general. Even the US, which is a baby of a country, has had presidents who had long hair while in office. Almost as late as the 1850s.

              The long hair styles were wigs.

              Blatant projection.

              An argument about wigs being the cultural of heritage of White men in the United States is disingenuous.

              You’re trying to have your cake and eat it too. You want to claim heritage when it comes to black people, but then only talk about modern western culture (which you attribute solely to white people) when it comes to white people. The reality is that if we look at modern western culture, even for black people, it’s predominately short hair. If we want to look at heritage of people, there are plenty of white heritages, include in the US itself, of men having long hair. It’s you who has the double-standard. .

              This is argument is historically inaccurate. White men in the US have historically had short hair. It’s been that way since the early 19th century. Black men have a historical culture heritage of long hair that predates the policing of black hair in the United States.

              If this is the metric by which we measure racism, then it’s you who is racist

              Ad hominem attacks reduce your argument’s credibility. edit: typo

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                No one is talking about wigs? WTF? Why do you keep lying?

                lol. I’m done.

                • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  No one is talking about wigs? WTF? Why do you keep lying?

                  Long hair styles were wigs. Your argument was refuted so now you’re relying on splitting hairs over what hair styles actually were.

                  lol. I’m done.

                  After calling me a racist too. ROFL XD

                  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Long hair styles were wigs.

                    Incorrect. And that’s a fact (not opinion, maybe you’ll learn). It’s so easy to look up to make sure you aren’t wrong. . .and still you don’t? Amazing.

                    After calling me a racist too.

                    I just said using your own metric, you’re racist. I don’t agree with your metric, which should be obvious.