• theluddite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It didn’t really occur to me to consider an interpretation of “emissions” that excludes CO2. Had they stuck with the word “pollutant,” then sure, but what they said was “emissions.”

    There’s probably some reasonable interpretation of these findings that’s productive and useful, but I think whoever wrote this is playing a bit fast and loose.