• PutinOnTheRitz@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Non-tank sized vans are available and have better aerodynamics and overall utility than a truck.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Those are called hatchbacks and are pretty awesome! Unfortunately the Civic hatchback I had for 15 years would have been better for the last 5 years I owned it if the hatch area was just a bed becauseI no longer needed a back seat but would have been 10x more convenient with an open bed in the fact same space instead of being enclosed.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They may have better coefficient of friction, but vans have a high frontal cross section. That tends to cancel out that advantage.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        We rented a minivan on a recent trip and got 35+ mpg with a very full load, and it had some decent get up and go. It had a long sloped front end and I would absolutely recommend minivans to anyone who needs more space than a hatchback!

        It wouldn’t work for me outside that situation though, which is why I keep saying no to those suggestions.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Was that a hybrid? I’m having trouble finding a minivan that gets that kind of mpg that isn’t a hybrid. Conversely, a hybrid crossover will easily break 40mpg for both city and highway. It weighs around the same while having better aerodynamics.

          To be clear, aerodynamics dominates on the highway, and weight dominates in cities.