alphacyberranger to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoU.N. chief calls for an end to $7 trillion in fossil fuel subsidieswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1834arrow-down13cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.online
arrow-up1831arrow-down1external-linkU.N. chief calls for an end to $7 trillion in fossil fuel subsidieswww.cnbc.comalphacyberranger to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.online
minus-squaredarqlinkfedilink56•10 months agoDoing literally nothing to reduce fossil fuels would be better than the thing we are currently doing, which is subsidising them. Really puts into perspective all the climate “promises”.
minus-squareCascadeDismayedlinkfedilinkEnglish-13•10 months agoMass starvation is a price we’re willing to pay. End the subsidies… /s
minus-squaredarqlinkfedilink6•10 months agoGee whiz, you pretended to be me and said something I didn’t say! I’m so owned right now!
minus-square@Honytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish3•10 months agoMass starvation is indeed better than the extinction of mankind. What is the point of an economy if there is no one left to use it?
minus-square@MonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-29 months agoExpensiver oil would lead to faster availlability of oecological alternative products to stuff made out of oil.
Doing literally nothing to reduce fossil fuels would be better than the thing we are currently doing, which is subsidising them. Really puts into perspective all the climate “promises”.
Mass starvation is a price we’re willing to pay. End the subsidies… /s
Gee whiz, you pretended to be me and said something I didn’t say! I’m so owned right now!
Mass starvation is indeed better than the extinction of mankind.
What is the point of an economy if there is no one left to use it?
Expensiver oil would lead to faster availlability of oecological alternative products to stuff made out of oil.