• AgreeableLandscape☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    I mean, if they halted operations, presumably permanently as they seem to imply, it shouldn’t matter right? Since they intend to ditch all their assets and exit the market anyway, right?

    Unless this whole thing was a marketing ploy for Western audiences and they plan to start right back up once people stop paying attention. Hmm…

      • Julianus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        …with a weaker bluff. It’s childish, like the toothless sanctioning of Biden and Hilary Clinton. Or threatening international volunteers for the Ukrainians with legal action, while inviting Syrian mercenaries at the time. The noises coming out of the Kremlin have become farcical.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 years ago

          Nationalizing stuff is most definitely not a bluff. There is absolutely no reason for them not to do this, what’s the west going to do in response exactly?

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    How is the government going to handle the use of public computers if Microsoft is getting out of Russia? I mean, I’m sure they already have a lot of pirated copies and old versions of Windows, as any (at least third world) country does, but at some point I don’t see any option to either pirate every copy of Windows or start using Linux.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        I know you can pirate it, I doubt a government will decide to launch a national scale campaign to pirate every machine with Windows, it would probably be easier to install Linux any way since you have a lot of older machines.

        • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 years ago

          I think you’re right that government departments would use Linux in the long term… seems to me it could take months, if not years, for workers to learn all the new ways of doing things, virtualise / wrap / port any Windows-only software they’re using, replace or write drivers for any non-Linux-supporting hardware they use, and fill any holes in accessibility tech – I’ve heard that JAWS is a long way ahead of Linux equivalents.

          Setting up a fake license server, or rolling out something like MAS using Group Policy might make a lot of sense in the meantime…

          • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I agree there are cases where you need specific software and in that cases it might be hard, but also there are a shit ton of other cases where everything you need is simply a word processor and spreadsheet.

            • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 years ago

              To be clear, I hope places just cut straight to Linux, I’m saying it seems likely there’ll be a transition period. It still takes time to retrain on a different word processor or spreadsheet software, especially if you’ve been using Microsoft’s 20+ hours a week.

              • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                Yeah, I know, I know, also people who are not tech savvy, you change the smallest thing to their GUI and they get lost, you need to do some training stuff.