• Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 months ago

    VBox could be nice, but Oracle is on a licensing hunt for people who install the extension pack on potentially work-related systems. Technically it is free for personal use, but is like explicitly inviting the vampire into your home - nothing might happen, but you wouldn’t know until the moment you have 2 tiny holes in your neck.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They don’t even care if you don’t get the extension pack, we’ve been pestered by those leeches even for the open source licensed for all use main package only

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Who cares. Why use sub par Type 2 virtualization with DKMS modules when you can use built+in world class, industry standard, Type 1 hypervisor with Qemu+KVM and Virt-Manager? Already has clipboard sharing with qemu-guest-agent.

    • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I totally agree with you on the Linux side. However, I first got into Linux by using it in Virtualbox on Windows. In the Windows world, as far as I know, it’s the easiest-to-use free-as-in-beer1 hypervisor, so long as UEFI support has improved since I last used it.

      1: I say this because of the non-libre extension pack.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hyper-v is bundled with windows now and is just as easy to use as virtualbox (slightly easier for windows guests since the drivers are bundled in the os)

        • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Who would have thought? I’ve hardly touched Windows in over 2 years (mostly other people’s computers and the occasional app in my GPU-accelerated VM) so I haven’t kept up much.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean yeah, Qemu/KVM is Linux software. We’re talking about Linux here. Ain’t ever heard of that other thing you speak about. Think I I stalled it once in a VM to run some firmware update on some obscure device.

        • bravemonkey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Vbox will create a bridge with my wifi card (I’m a laptop user with no option for a wired nic in the host).

          I’ve never been able to get kvm to do that and haven’t found any working instructions online that a simpleton like me can follow

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        vbox is easy until it starts saying vt-d isn’t enabled and refuses to start when it fact it is.

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Virtualizing Windows 10 for various binbows-only work stuff

      Virtualizing Windows XP to run Office from before it started sucking

        • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ok so I guess I am the stupid because I always assumed kernel-level virtualization meant that you were limited to guest OS’s that used the Linux kernel. I was drawing incorrect connections to Docker

          TIL

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I think it should work with some version of the Q35 chipset, if not PC should work. But Wine might be a better option if you just want to run some old version of office (or frankly just use LibreOffice)

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are you paying for a Virtual box commercial license? They change for every employee in the company not just active users.

        Just use KVM and be done with it. You can get the Windows guest drivers and addons from the Fedora project

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I teach a class where I use VirtualBox. Students commonly use Windows or Mac. I use Linux.

      It is very handily to use VirtualBox where, if I demo something, the same steps will work on the student machine. It is also nice for documentation if you want to show a screenshot.

      I have never used the “extension pack” for this so it would be fine. Educational use seems to be permitted regardless.

    • SomeKindaName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because at least for me getting a shared folder to work was a total pain in the ass. Virtualbox just worked in that regard.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think VBox is more user friendly? Virt-manager would need a GTK4 (?) update and a few UX improvements.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Virtual manager requires a lot less clicks. It also uses libvirt so you can run VMs in the background and on startup.

        If you want a better UI look into other clients.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Certainly using a slightly dated Gtk is still more user friendly and better integrated than the god aweful stuff Oracle puts up. What UX improvements are you looking for?

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because for some reason, no matter what I try, Windows 10 desktop is laggy as hell on Qemu, and smooth out of the box on VirtualBox.

    • leo85811nardo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because they are for different use cases. I use QEMU+KVM on desktop for games and 3D CAD software, because of its undeniable performance advantage. But on work laptop, I use VirtualBox to test my software on different platforms. On VirtualBox it’s relatively easy to initialize a VM, configure network, file sharing and device passthrough, and its snapshot feature allows me recreate the same environment for troubleshooting

        • leo85811nardo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I just looked them up and maybe you are right. But QEMU definitely lacks a GUI config tool that is both easy to use and allows for advanced features like snapshots. So far the only ones I know is GNOME Boxes and Virt Manager, and neither is as good as providing handy ways to configure as VirtualBox. I could probably just write the XML config or QEMU command by the documentation, but next time it could be a different scenario so I have to investigate the docs and maybe a few more forum posts. In VirtualBox, the buttons that do everything for me are always there

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            But QEMU definitely lacks a GUI config tool that is both easy to use and allows for advanced features like snapshots.

            Let me say it louder for the people in the back: https://virt-manager.org/

            It literally does everything you mentioned, including allowing you to edit the XML files manually to reach advanced or obscure features that are not exposed. And it can do it remotely via SSH, and it managed LXC and Xen too.

            • leo85811nardo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Last time I tried Virt manager, I couldn’t figure out bridge networks and ended up corrupted the XML config for the VM. Skill issue for me I guess

              • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Bridge networking should be as simple as selecting “bridge” in the network interface setting and putting the name of your bridge interface… You can create a bridge interface with Network-Manager. Or use macvtap.

    • NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t VirtualBox use KVM if it’s available?

      I likeVBoxManage. Any crazy thing I’ve ever imagined doing with a VM it’s already supported.

      So, to answer your question - I use VirtualBox because it does everything I want and I’ve never had a reason to look elsewhere.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, VBox does not use KVM unless you use some off brand backend, which is an extra layer of complexity and software you must install and manage.

        Absolutely everything you might want to do with VBoxManager is going to be available via virsh and the multiple libviet utilities.

        I’ve never had a reason to look elsewhere.

        Not using Type 2 hypervisor would be a good one. Not being beholden to Oracle’s shitry licensing schemes is certainly another.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What ever you happens, do not use this for commercial purposes. Virtual box is free and libre but the guest addons are not. They will find and bill you for every single person in your company. Not per active user but per employee. This has cost companies millions

    Under Linux you can just use KVM. Gnome boxes or virtual manager should work fine.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      And they DO NOT CARE if you don’t actually use or install the extensions (unless something has changed, the guest add-ons are part of the free open source part, it’s the extensions for things like USB 2 support that aren’t free for commercial)

      You can use it freely, by license, but they’ll come after you anyway

      I’m still pissed that they bought Sun, so many great products now controlled by those assholes… Virtual box, MySQL, Solaris, Java…

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only license that VirtualBox and the Guest Additions are even released under is GPL3. I do not even see a dual license.

        What remedy are they proposing when they come after you? I am not sure I would even take their call or respond to their letter. If I did, I would just send them the GPL text, announce that we are complying, and tell them to pound sand.

        I suppose it might be fun to tell them that I got it via IBM or Red Hat or something and to take it up with them. But I probably would not actually be dishonest about. As above, if I got a letter asking me to pay for their GPL software, I would just mutter “idiots” and throw it away. If they want to persist, it would only cost them money and I would continue to respond the same way.

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The extension pack does cost and is licensed differently from the core product

          I did try that tact, more or less, but the fact is they kept harassing our licensing people and it just wasn’t worth it so we removed every copy of it and used something else

          And the truth is, Oracle can throw an ungodly amount of legal hassle at people if they want, right or wrong… Just because you’re in the right and should win doesn’t mean there’ll be anything left of you on the other side, and they won’t have felt a thing while destroying you out of capriciousness

          They’re pure evil and even their fully open source products should be avoided like the plague that they are. Hopefully someone will fork them at some point so we don’t have to be tied to that shitty company, but until then, better to just leave them alone, because it’s just not worth the hassle.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve just seen quite a few posts about companies getting audited by Oracle over Virtual box and Java

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use the version of VirtualBox that has been modified to use KVM as the back-end. Do you know if it has the same problems?

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I do not believe I have had to accept anything. I am installing it from the AUR and it builds from source. Pretty sure it just went straight into the UI the first time I launched it ( without a EULA ).

          I will have to look into it. Thank you for the answer through.

  • ouch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    Use software owned by Oracle? Fuck that, I would rather get mauled by a bear.

  • s4if@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Neat. As I am in the process of fully migrating to wayland, it is good. I only work as a teacher, so I don’t really concern about licensing, lol.