• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      No this dipshit just says whatever he thinks is going to be the most popular with the tech bros he is desperate to be in front of.

      • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s an expression. In this context Elon is the broken clock and saying desktops should run Linux is one of the rare times he’s been right about something.

        • shimdidly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          rare times he’s been right about something.

          Started a space company, and an EV company. Both longshots, both wildly successful.

          Bought Twitter. Laid of 80% of the employees. Still runs totally fine.

          Your position is nakedly indefensible. I’d be curious what you think he’s actually wrong about.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      You say that, but I’ll be more than willing to try and sell him a copy of the source code.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Let me put it to you this way.

          Elon Musk fanboys, now running arch.

          Just… Let that simmer for a minute.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            37
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Anyone smart enough to run Arch is smart enough to recognize Elon is an imbecile.

              • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                5 months ago

                But do you recognize Musk as an imbecile? If you do you’re smarter than you think.

              • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Take it from me, people who openly say they’re idiots usually aren’t. Socrates: I now know I know nothing.

            • olutukko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              you literally have to run installation script or follow instructions from arch wiki. slap some de to it and you’re good. doesn’t take a smart person to do.

              to properly maintain it for longer periods forever though, takes some more skill.

            • Jayjader@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              Maybe nowadays, with Elon’s imbecility so publicly visible.

              I’ve run Arch for close to 10 years, and was pretty jazzed by Musk in the early days of his presiding over Tesla and Space X. Then again, I was barely an adult at the time, and I hadn’t yet come across the first reports of terrible working conditions and his overall shittyness as a manager/exec.

              • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                5 months ago

                A lot of people forget how overwhelmingly, insanely popular Musk was with way too online nerds. He was reddit’s golden child for years. Part of this is that whenever Disney started releasing the Marvel movies, beginning with Iron Man, Musk was front and center as the core inspiration for Tony Stark (yes, I’m serious, the director and Robert Downey Jr. basically went on record as saying as much) and he fucking milked that shit. It’s also important to understand that for a time he was seen as a forward looking entrepreneur whose business was “going to help save the planet by making electric cars so popular that every car manufacturer would switch to electric vehicle production to keep up.” If Musk was a genius at one thing, it was manipulating public perception of himself and his enterprises. It took years of him being a thin-skinned weirdo and massive corporate tool to undo the amount of positive sentiment he’d built for himself and Tesla.

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Chromium was, however, a Google product from the very beginning that Google open-sourced themselves. Linux is too big with too many non-profit and for-profit companies and tons of independent individuals participating in its development for one person or company to control it outright.

        I mean, sure, for profit companies like Red Hat, SUSE, Canonical do have some influence but not so much that you can’t ignore their contributions if you don’t like them.

        For example, some ubuntu based distros (i.e Mint) circumvent snap from being installed the ubuntu way (without asking) because it goes against their philosophy. And if that’s still too much Ubuntu for you, there’s a Debian Edition of mint. And if that’s still too same-y for you, there are dozens of other distros based on slackware, rhel/fedora, arch, Gentoo, etc. There even are Linux distros without GNU.

        So, unless Muskiboy buys Linus Torvalds, I think the Linux community could easily ignore him building his own xOS.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      He’ll get sued by Apple for infringing on their OS X trademark, and he’ll invent laws claiming he’s in the right, and he’ll lose billions, and then he’ll claim he invented Linux and he’s a genius.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I kind of want to see this go down. There are a few companies you don’t fuck with. Apple is definitely one of them. I am sure their lawyers are just as smart and soulless as Disney’s

      • s_s@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Musk has been using x.com since the Mac OS 8 days.

        He’d easily have prior rights.

        • darganon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          He sold it into PayPal, then bought it back from PayPal a couple years ago.

          Not sure how trademarks work, but I think it gets stickier when it’s used for different purposes. like how there’s Starcraft trailers and the game.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unfortunately, XOS has already been taken by Infinix, a budget phone brand that primarily sells in Africa, for its own ad-riddled bloated Android skin.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is it going to be a Ubuntu from though? I can see his engineers coming to him saying we should fork Ubuntu for many very good reasons. Then he does to much ketamine and then tells them to use DistroX, because the X

      (I can’t actually tell if DistroX is real. I could only find one reference to it. But hey is that going to stop Musk)

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Elon just tries to get approval by finding a dominate opinion among a group of people and parroting back what they say and want. Kinda obvious and pathetic.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think you are probably right in a way… Remember how android started as a weird Linux kernel (supposedly, rumors ran around at the time)? But today android is a piece of shit that everyone is enslaved on, and Linux still rules. That’s because you can’t be a dumbass windows user and just become a Linux user overnight. Well I guess it takes like 5 minutes to install, but you might end up frustrated staring at a screen. There’s lots to learn before you can get comfortable. Else android…or like me, Ubuntu. Sorry to Linux, but Ubuntu is where I gave up trying to recompile X for the 200th time.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, if it acts as a gateway drug (like ubuntu), then we are on the good side, right?

        • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nothing is really wrong with any distro. They each just have they general strengths and weaknesses. Different distros for specific tasks.

          It’s all just a flame war.

        • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nothing really. Distros have different goals. Some distros have more access to bleeding edge updates than ubuntu.

          Some don’t like that ubuntu forces you to use the snap store, which is proprietary, with packages that are larger and run slow and hog a lot of memory compared to other package managers (such as apt)

            • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              yeah, many packages now defaults as snaps in ubuntu. firefox being a single but prominent example, the package on apt simply installs the snap now. You can get around that but you’ll have to add mozillas repository. It’s Canonical’s proprietary thing so I guess it makes sense.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ubuntu is fine. But Caninical has made business decisions that are 100% inline with the typical foss intent.

    • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Realistically, he would call it ElonOS, hire a bunch of shitty systems programmers to cobble together a bullshit operating system mostly comprised of code stolen from other open source projects, insist that it be written in python because “python is critical to AI,” talk about how the OS integrates with AI seamlessly while having no actual AI in it at all, sell it with a tiered subscription that locked basic functionality, like being able to use the file system, behind a paywall, and then quickly abandon the project and fire everyone involved, having made no real money from the venture but still referring to it as a “triumph of engineering.”

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I really want him to do this. Could you imagine the fallout from the war between Musk’s lawyers and Apple’s lawyers?

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 months ago

        so a regular analog clock. which is why the saying is actually “twice a day” not “once”.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I still maintain the correct version if the saying is a “stopped” clock. A clock can be broken in other ways that make it almost never right.

          Also I’m not sure analog clocks should be considered “regular” at this point. If seems like they’re mostly decorative items now, and most actual timekeeping is done with clocks in phones and computers.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            i said regular as a qualifier because i was expecting someone to point out niche clocks like a 24-hour one or whatever. plus if we’re talking digital clocks the saying falls apart anyway because most of them would just not show anything rather than getting stuck on one time.

          • Case@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have an analog clock in my man cave. Its very steam punk in design. It is NOT accurate and is ONLY a decoration piece that gets corrected when I can spare the attention. It runs fast, if anyone cares.

            Ultimately, my wife liked it, bought it for me, and put it up. Not gonna upset her over something I really don’t care about.