Excerpt:

To underline Blanchfield’s point, the ChatGPT book selection process was found to be unreliable and inconsistent when repeated by Popular Science. “A repeat inquiry regarding ‘The Kite Runner,’ for example, gives contradictory answers,” the Popular Science reporters noted. “In one response, ChatGPT deems Khaled Hosseini’s novel to contain ‘little to no explicit sexual content.’ Upon a separate follow-up, the LLM affirms the book ‘does contain a description of a sexual assault.’”

  • Five@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So many questions!

    Are you suggesting that the political aspects of technology shouldn’t be discussed in a technology community?

    Are you implying that technology is apolitical? That there are technology subjects to discuss that don’t have a political component?

    Do discussions of the applications of technology not belong in a technology community?

      • Five@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The guy you’re trying to pass the buck to, money_loo, is from a lemmy instance that only has Chicago sports communities and whose front page is mostly federated meme posts. You’re a BeeHaw user. You’ve presumably read and agreed to the Beehaw community documents.

        I expect more than anti-intellectualism from you.

        • money_loo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn, we stereotyping people based on the Lemmy community they joined now? That’s wild. I joined this smaller instance not for its content but for its reliability and nearby server location.

          I also have like four other users of the same name on different servers in case this one drops.

          Sorry if I wasn’t mainstream enough or something to form an opinion.